by Dr. Robert Zuber, Global Action to Prevent War
Among the proposals emerging from this year's session of the UN Disarmament Commission (UNDC), there were two that particularly caught our eye. The Swiss proposals presented during the opening exchange of views calling for more involvement by experts in the work of the UNDC is one that Global Action to Prevent War and Armed Conflict (GAPW) has discussed in other commentary and fully supports in practice.
20 April 2013
10 April 2013
Building blocks
by Dr. Robert Zuber, Global Action to Prevent War
The general exchange of views at this years’ UN Disarmament Commission (UNDC) put on display a mixture of post-Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) negotiating fatigue, a bit of bellicose rhetoric, and a certain resignation that outcomes for this year’s substantive session were unlikely to be more noteworthy than previous years.
The general exchange of views at this years’ UN Disarmament Commission (UNDC) put on display a mixture of post-Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) negotiating fatigue, a bit of bellicose rhetoric, and a certain resignation that outcomes for this year’s substantive session were unlikely to be more noteworthy than previous years.
04 April 2013
Opening of the 2013 session of the UN Disarmament Commission: Time for substantive recommendations
by Katherine Prizeman, Global Action to Prevent War
On Monday, the UN Disarmament Commission (UNDC) opened its annual substantive session. The forum, which enjoys universal membership and is often referred to as the UN’s “disarmament think tank,” is surrounded by much anxiety about its ability to garner a consensus outcome before the end of its three-week session.
On Monday, the UN Disarmament Commission (UNDC) opened its annual substantive session. The forum, which enjoys universal membership and is often referred to as the UN’s “disarmament think tank,” is surrounded by much anxiety about its ability to garner a consensus outcome before the end of its three-week session.
08 October 2012
Direct action at First Committee
by Ray Acheson, Reaching Critical Will of WILPF
First Committee is set to begin once again in the midst of dynamic and dangerous times. The relevance of its mandate, disarmament and international security, is as pressing as ever. Looking around the world today one can see mounting regional and international tensions, civil wars and revolutions, increasing armed violence, and, overshadowing us all, the threat of nuclear weapons. High levels of military spending, weapons production, trade, and stockpiling, and armed conflict undermine the key objective of the United Nations: preserving international peace and security. Yet one can also see many examples of ordinary people trying to rein back the violence, overcome militarism, and achieve peace.
First Committee is set to begin once again in the midst of dynamic and dangerous times. The relevance of its mandate, disarmament and international security, is as pressing as ever. Looking around the world today one can see mounting regional and international tensions, civil wars and revolutions, increasing armed violence, and, overshadowing us all, the threat of nuclear weapons. High levels of military spending, weapons production, trade, and stockpiling, and armed conflict undermine the key objective of the United Nations: preserving international peace and security. Yet one can also see many examples of ordinary people trying to rein back the violence, overcome militarism, and achieve peace.
Reflections on the UN General Assembly general debate 2012
by Ray Acheson, Reaching Critical Will of WILPF
The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) held its general debate from 25 September–1 October. The theme for this year’s debate, set by UNGA President Vuk Jeremić of Serbia, was “adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations by peaceful means”. In his open remarks he specified, “A solution to an international problem can be legitimately achieved only upon renunciation of unilateralism; it can become truly sustainable only when its provisions are willingly accepted and fulfilled in good faith.”
The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) held its general debate from 25 September–1 October. The theme for this year’s debate, set by UNGA President Vuk Jeremić of Serbia, was “adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations by peaceful means”. In his open remarks he specified, “A solution to an international problem can be legitimately achieved only upon renunciation of unilateralism; it can become truly sustainable only when its provisions are willingly accepted and fulfilled in good faith.”
Women, gender, disarmament, and the arms trade
by Maria Butler, Madeleine Rees, and Ray Acheson, Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF)
This year’s First Committee will once again address the issue of women and disarmament, arms control, and non-proliferation through a resolution tabled by the government of Trinidad and Tobago. This resolution, first introduced and adopted by consensus as resolution 65/69 in 2010, recognizes “the valuable contribution of women to practical disarmament measures carried out at the local, national, regional and subregional levels in the prevention and reduction of armed violence and armed conflict, and in promoting disarmament, non-proliferation and arms control.”
This year’s First Committee will once again address the issue of women and disarmament, arms control, and non-proliferation through a resolution tabled by the government of Trinidad and Tobago. This resolution, first introduced and adopted by consensus as resolution 65/69 in 2010, recognizes “the valuable contribution of women to practical disarmament measures carried out at the local, national, regional and subregional levels in the prevention and reduction of armed violence and armed conflict, and in promoting disarmament, non-proliferation and arms control.”
Averting insanity on the ATT
by Daniel Mack, Instituto Sou da Paz
As First Committee gets underway, among many essential items on the docket one may receive special attention: the resolution that will define how and when Member States will attempt to fulfill their mandate in the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) process.
As First Committee gets underway, among many essential items on the docket one may receive special attention: the resolution that will define how and when Member States will attempt to fulfill their mandate in the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) process.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
